![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Or rather, one particular colleague; the rest of the mob I can handle; they may be vicious, arrogant and/or macho, but with them, it's mostly a show, and above all, they're not stupid.
This particular specimen, though...
Of course, it has to be my immediate pseudo-boss thing. "pseudo-boss" because he isn't actually boss of anything; he's just the "department technician" the students are assigned to.
And he's just... gah.
We had a discussion today in the office - that is, it was mainly between him and C., another student. Somehow, they'd been talking about funny movies.
C.: I didn't likeTraumschiff Surprise all that much. Schuh des Manitu was much better.
M. (the pseudo-boss): No!
C.: You liked Surprise better?
M.: No! I hated them both! These gay people!
C.: ... what, about how they were depicted?
M.: No! Gay people!
C.: So what was wrong with them?
M.: They were gay!
C.: ... so?
M.: I belong to the people who say that's not normal. Honestly, I want to punch them all.
C.: .... what do you mean by normal?
M.: It's not natural!
Me: But hey, there's gay penguins and guinea-pigs* and dolphins and all - it happens in nature, so it can hardly be unnatural.
C.: Exactly. Nature's way of keeping population in check.
M.: But those don't reproduce.
C.: ........ gay humans don't reproduce either.
M.: But I can't stand them! And they always try to convert you and hit on you!
What I THINK: To quote Michael Mittermeyer: Don't worry, M., gay men have TASTE.
What I SAY: *nothing*
C.: ... well, what do you do when a woman hits on you and you're not interested?
What I THINK: ... seriously, that guy isn't "not interested" when a woman hits on him.
What I SAY: *nothing*
M.: Tell her that she's got no chance.
C.: So you do the same with guys. Works for me.
[And C. is quite a pretty guy; I can imagine he will get hit on rather more often than M.. For real.]
Now - I wasn't actually surprised by M.'s stance on the topic; I hadn't expected anything else. If anything surprised me at all, it was C.'s reaction; C., like all men in the company, pretends to be the strong, uncaring heroic macho type, so I wasn't expecting him to be reasonable as far as a topic like this was concerned. As far as M. was concerned, it was just so typical. And the way his "arguments" were all so ridiculous, and he didn't even notice that they were, and that he was backing up even while he was being stubborn... just drives me up the wall. ARGH!
Or a discussion we had yesterday:
G. (another colleague): ... wait, don't you write Systematik with an H?²
M.: Of course you do!
G.: Christiane, you're good with languages. T or TH?
Me: T, of course. It's derived from System, which is written without an H, so Systematik is written without H, too.
M.: But Thematik ["subject matter"] is written with an H!
Me: ... yes, but Thematik's got nothing to do with it. Systematik comes from System.
M.: But Thematik is written with an H!
Me: Yes, M. Systematik, however, has nothing to do with Thematik. Honestly. *on my way out, because otherwise I'll go snappish, which I can't afford*
M.: I'll check the dictionary.
Which, of course, told him that it is not "Systhematik".
I know it's kind of petty to ride around on that sort of thing, but it happens All. The. Time. And he thinks he's so smart and brilliant and oh so superior to us poor little students because he, after all, has a proper jobthat is mostly done by the students assigned to him and is made. Fact is, he's a college dropout because he got offered the job of department technician while he was doing a student job at the company or something - at any rate, he dropped out of university to work there. Now I know that dropping out doesn't make you a worse person, or intellectually inferior to people who are yet trudging on. But it does mean that he isn't growing into anything any more. That's what Jörg always points out when I bitch about M.: He's reached his finish line for life, whereas I've already caught up with him - and am only just picking up speed.
If only M. weren't so damn smug about being all he can ever be. If that makes any sense. I mean, work-wise, there's exactly two things he can do better than I can: a)work in Excel (which I daresay I could learn if I had to) and b) stuff you need an administrative account on the company network for. That's all.
And then you're supposed to not be "intellectually arrogant", as my dear old German teacher used to put it.
*le sigh*
So I work out of the office as much as I can - luckily, there are many chances to do that - and stick to the other co-workers who may not be nicer but are at least smarter as much as possible, and only roll my eyes at him when I'm out of sight, and just don't argue with him because there's no point.
But ARGH.
*I did indeed have two pairs of gay guinea-pigs: Klopfer and Asterix, who were brothers on top of being gay; and Sam and Frodo. (To the hobbit-slash haters: Yes, I had named them before I knew that they were gay. To the hobbit-slash fanciers: But they were gay anyway. BTW, Sam topped. :p)
²A problem that can only arise, of course, in a language without dental fricatives.
This particular specimen, though...
Of course, it has to be my immediate pseudo-boss thing. "pseudo-boss" because he isn't actually boss of anything; he's just the "department technician" the students are assigned to.
And he's just... gah.
We had a discussion today in the office - that is, it was mainly between him and C., another student. Somehow, they'd been talking about funny movies.
C.: I didn't like
M. (the pseudo-boss): No!
C.: You liked Surprise better?
M.: No! I hated them both! These gay people!
C.: ... what, about how they were depicted?
M.: No! Gay people!
C.: So what was wrong with them?
M.: They were gay!
C.: ... so?
M.: I belong to the people who say that's not normal. Honestly, I want to punch them all.
C.: .... what do you mean by normal?
M.: It's not natural!
Me: But hey, there's gay penguins and guinea-pigs* and dolphins and all - it happens in nature, so it can hardly be unnatural.
C.: Exactly. Nature's way of keeping population in check.
M.: But those don't reproduce.
C.: ........ gay humans don't reproduce either.
M.: But I can't stand them! And they always try to convert you and hit on you!
What I THINK: To quote Michael Mittermeyer: Don't worry, M., gay men have TASTE.
What I SAY: *nothing*
C.: ... well, what do you do when a woman hits on you and you're not interested?
What I THINK: ... seriously, that guy isn't "not interested" when a woman hits on him.
What I SAY: *nothing*
M.: Tell her that she's got no chance.
C.: So you do the same with guys. Works for me.
[And C. is quite a pretty guy; I can imagine he will get hit on rather more often than M.. For real.]
Now - I wasn't actually surprised by M.'s stance on the topic; I hadn't expected anything else. If anything surprised me at all, it was C.'s reaction; C., like all men in the company, pretends to be the strong, uncaring heroic macho type, so I wasn't expecting him to be reasonable as far as a topic like this was concerned. As far as M. was concerned, it was just so typical. And the way his "arguments" were all so ridiculous, and he didn't even notice that they were, and that he was backing up even while he was being stubborn... just drives me up the wall. ARGH!
Or a discussion we had yesterday:
G. (another colleague): ... wait, don't you write Systematik with an H?²
M.: Of course you do!
G.: Christiane, you're good with languages. T or TH?
Me: T, of course. It's derived from System, which is written without an H, so Systematik is written without H, too.
M.: But Thematik ["subject matter"] is written with an H!
Me: ... yes, but Thematik's got nothing to do with it. Systematik comes from System.
M.: But Thematik is written with an H!
Me: Yes, M. Systematik, however, has nothing to do with Thematik. Honestly. *on my way out, because otherwise I'll go snappish, which I can't afford*
M.: I'll check the dictionary.
Which, of course, told him that it is not "Systhematik".
I know it's kind of petty to ride around on that sort of thing, but it happens All. The. Time. And he thinks he's so smart and brilliant and oh so superior to us poor little students because he, after all, has a proper job
If only M. weren't so damn smug about being all he can ever be. If that makes any sense. I mean, work-wise, there's exactly two things he can do better than I can: a)work in Excel (which I daresay I could learn if I had to) and b) stuff you need an administrative account on the company network for. That's all.
And then you're supposed to not be "intellectually arrogant", as my dear old German teacher used to put it.
*le sigh*
So I work out of the office as much as I can - luckily, there are many chances to do that - and stick to the other co-workers who may not be nicer but are at least smarter as much as possible, and only roll my eyes at him when I'm out of sight, and just don't argue with him because there's no point.
But ARGH.
*I did indeed have two pairs of gay guinea-pigs: Klopfer and Asterix, who were brothers on top of being gay; and Sam and Frodo. (To the hobbit-slash haters: Yes, I had named them before I knew that they were gay. To the hobbit-slash fanciers: But they were gay anyway. BTW, Sam topped. :p)
²A problem that can only arise, of course, in a language without dental fricatives.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 06:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:20 pm (UTC)Do you want to borrow H. and take him to work with you? He'd probably hit on C. rather than M., but he might at least teach M. a thing or two about homophobia. ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 08:00 pm (UTC)(*way too amused* *patpats the elf* Of course.)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 11:17 pm (UTC)"What is wrong?" I asked.
"I'm waiting on the Hecht's ladies," she said, "and they are treating me like crap because they work in a nice department store and make more than I do."
(Our restaurant was in a mall, and the "Hecht's ladies" were notorious pains as well as pompous idiots who worked down the hall from us.)
"But Jamie," I said, "you are working your way through school. You could get a job paying more than theirs if you wanted to probably, but you are getting your education, so you have to work here."
But it was amazing the number of people who would look down on us--students--because "we still waited tables in a restaurant." Argh.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 01:11 am (UTC)M.: No! I hated them both! These gay people!
C.: ... what, about how they were depicted?
M.: No! Gay people!
Very enlightening...
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 01:52 am (UTC)You so win for best journal entry read by me today. *hands you a cookie*
And M needs a good smiting.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:09 am (UTC)He does. I think I'll wait for the last day of work there, though, and then smite him good when he can't take revenge anymore. YESH.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 12:17 pm (UTC)*dies of the cute, omg, so much*