oloriel: A comic style speech bubble declaring "Waking up this morning was a pointless act of masochism." (bad day)
Just got new information: Starting on June 15, the primary schools will return to (almost) normal teaching.
Why? Because it has been decided that the lack of social contact and schooling is more harmful to children under the age of 10 than the danger of infection.

To which I have several questions, the first being, do these politicians realise that children up to the age of 10 may nonetheless have family members for whom the danger of infection is possibly a bit higher, and the more kids you put in a classroom (and the more often you do this), the higher the risk of infection?
And the second being, do they realise that the summer holidays start on June 26? They are literally re-opening schools for two weeks. They're putting the kids back with (all) their classmates for two weeks, claiming that this will save their little spirits, before they all split up for the holidays anyway. How much of a difference do they think these two weeks will make?

I'm honestly baffled.

Secondary schools like mine are told to continue with their current practice but also to provide more classes, whatever that means. So this mostly concerns Felix. (Nonetheless, I am now in school on Thursdays as well. Although we now have more teachers (b/c no more blanket high-risk group exists) and fewer classes (b/c the Grade 10s are done with their exams and have had their classes reduced as a result), for some reason I ended up with two lessons more. This is fine, although it's not my favourite class - although split into two smaller groups, they're certainly more manageable. If there's one thing I wish we could keep from this crisis, it's classes of 12-15 students max! Although today's grade sevens certainly demonstrated that even a class of 12 students can be impossible to work with.)

Don't mind me. I've done something stupid with my back again and have a splitting headache as a result, and also got my period yesterday. Maybe I'm just unreasonably grumpy.
oloriel: A comic style speech bubble declaring "Waking up this morning was a pointless act of masochism." (bad day)
So it turned out that my free weekday was load-bearing.

Like. I knew that it was a really pleasant day to have. Unlike the weekend, when everybody is at home and clamouring for attention and expecting things because, after all, it's the free weekend, that was a day that I had pretty much to myself, and I needed that. I knew I'd miss it once it was gone. I didn't realise how much, though.

In November, the free day turned into an additional workday, with my qualification classes at ZfSL (or "seminary") from 9:30 to 16:00, which is already a lot of time during which I have to perform the role of attentive, highly motivated, sociable and fully capable adult (even during break time, which is after all spent with the other trainees). By the luck (not) of the draw, seminary is in Siegen. Siegen is 60 km from where I live as the raven flies, but unfortuantely I cannot fly, so I have the delightful options of either taking mostly country roads through the scenic Sauerland, which is every bit as remote as it sounds, or take the highway all the way to Cologne and then take the A4 eastwards, or take the highway towards Hagen and then take the A45 eastwards. (I'm currently going for a combination of "country roads until they meet the A45 or A4" but that probably won't work in real winter.) As a result, my commute takes an hour and ten minutes at a good time, and can easily take up to two hours during rush hour. So in reality, I'm away from home (and, what's worse, have to be fully focused) for twelve hours. I'm only teaching two additional classes, but those de facto twelve hours of seminary are grinding me down. For three weeks now, I've been constantly on the verge of crying just from exhaustion, and that's without anything sad happening. (That, or laughing hysterically. At seminary last week, I had an absolutely infantile laughing flash when a colleague told us how her four-year old daughter had stood in the living-room and declared loudly, "Alexa! Spiel Rotzi Kotzi!"* Which is funny, but is it funny enough to laugh-cry and get stomach cramps? Probably not.) Seminary itself is OK in parts and really interesting in others, but it's hard work. Lots of reading, lots of group work where you can't let anyone down. It's also slightly annoying that even with all the students being cooperative, highly motivated adults, the seminary teachers' plans never fit the actual time frame - something that would cost us trainee teachers points once they start observing our actual classes! On the plus side (I suppose?) it makes me appreciate more what the students have to do: Sitting through up to eight hours of lessons where they're expected to participate and perform, on top of going through puberty and trying to have hobbies and a social life. Student is a hard job, without a question.

It's a tough time in school. There are conferences, parent-teacher talks and other additional things every other week. Although I'm still officially a part-time teacher, I still have to participate full-time in these things, and it all adds up. It's also a stressful time for the students. We're half-way between fall break and the Christmas vacation, a time full of written exams and presentations and the usual problems that come with all that. With Christmas approaching, at least a third of the kids are exuberant with expectation and at least one third are frustrated with the gap between their real life and the glamourised image of happy families and unlimited wealth in the pre-Christmas commercials. Kids at our school come from all walks of life, so there's lots of material for conflict and crises. At best, teaching them is like herding cats; on occasion, it feels like putting one fire out while someone in the back of class lights the next three. I love the teaching! But believe it or not, it's hard work. In an attempt to summon some holiday spirit in the middle of this stressful time, I've packed an advent calendar for my 6th graders (they're 25 kids, so it more or less works out) when I packed the advent calendars for my own kids. They seem to appreciate it so far; I can only hope that nobody will be upset because they're number, like, 23 instead of 5. (I let them draw lots, so it was all in the hands of Lady Luck, but still.) We're having a class Christmas party next week (another long day), and I have to admit that I'm rather relieved that the class voted against doing an English play or rehearsing some English carols for the occasion...

Then, when I get home, of course there's still family life to maintain, because it's not the kids' fault that I'm now as busy and exhausted as their dad. And it's not Jörg's fault that things like buying groceries or doing the laundry or making dinner just plain putting the kids to bed are now an additional load on an already long list, rather than something that I can easily do on my free day or at the end of a manageable half-day. This is something we'll have to suss out anew, too.

Probably as a result of all this, my mind absolutely closes down when it comes to analytical thinking, which is awkward because I still haven't finished the fandom studies essay I've been working on since before the summer holidays. It just won't come together and it's so frustrating because I know what I'm trying to say but I don't know how to say it, and the mere thought of putting the bibliography together makes me want to cry (yet again). The only thing I want to write is TEA, because I currently know (more or less) what's happening next and also because it's currently offering the gratification of some really great comments. But even when I have the time to write (something other than tests and work sheets or assignments for seminary), I feel guilty about writing fanfic rather than the essay. I should just withdraw, but after already asking for an extension, that feels like a massive failure. I was so hoping to get a foot back in the academic door with that essay, with the long-term goal being possibly doing a PhD in Tolkien Studies (hey, if that's an actual specialisation in English Philology, I may as well use it). But whom am I kidding? I don't have the stamina for that kind of academic work if I can't even write a crappy essay.

In conclusion, I'm not a happy camper right now. I'm hoping that things will get easier with habit and that it won't be going like this for the full two years that seminary lasts. I hope my current state is just the normal adjustment to a new challenge, rather than actual burn-out. I really don't need that.

Adulting is haaard.



- - -
*Rolf Zukowski is a popular childrens' singer-songwriter in Germany. He was already hugely popular when I was a kid - my first "pop" concert was a Rolf Zukowski concert! The kid's rendering of his name as Rotzi Kotzi is doubly hilarious not just because it sounds funny, but also because Rotze is snot and Kotze is puke.
oloriel: (Default)
Came home from school to be welcomed by a phone call. It was the mother-in-law. "Hey, I'm in hospital with Julian." Cue panic.

The explanation, when it came, was comparatively harmless. Apparently, Julian ate some Himalayan balsam (Impatiens glandulifera) in Kindergarten. Specifically, he ate the seeds. This is OK because the seeds are a part of the plant that is, in fact, only dangerous to humans if they are allergic to hazelnuts and the like, which Julian is not.

Nonetheless, since the Kindergarten teachers didn't see it (they were told that Julian Was Eating Plants by the other kids), they called me. But I was at work and didn't answer the phone. Then they called the husband. Who was also at work and didn't answer the phone. So they called the mother-in-law.

The mother-in-law, overwhelmed and evidently panicked, first pressed the Emergency Call button on her watch twice, and then drove to Kindergarten to pick Julian up and take him to hospital. And when she figured I would be home, she called again to let me know what was going on. They were just waiting for the results of whatever tests the doctors were running.

So all should be well, and they should be home in an hour or so, and I really shouldn't be so angry.

But I am. I am completely unrationally angry.
I'm angry with the Kindergarten teachers, who didn't just ask Julian which part of the plant he ate, and/or didn't believe him. (His father specifically explained that he must ONLY eat the seeds, not any other part of the plant, and he's smart enough to follow that advice.)
I'm angry with the mother-inlaw, who didn't just agree to take Julian home and keep an eye on him, but instead took him to A&E as if he'd eaten holly berries or sth.
I know they're all doing the responsible thing - when in doubt, ask an expert - but the thing is -- there was no emergency. He knew what he was doing, and they didn't even see it and just jumped to conclusions.

I suppose part of this is just my annoyance with Kindergarten teachers - or school teachers for that matter - having only vague and unspecific knowledge about the plants in their immediate environment, and raising a completely unnecessary alarm over harmless things. I have at least two more stories along those lines, one of them from the same Kindergarten. In Felix' first spring there, a DEADLY POISONOUS PLANT had been noticed in the narrow frontyard, where no child ever steps and no child eats anything. It was SUPER URGENT that these DEADLY POISONOUS PLANTS were removed at once. I volunteered, and promptly found out that the SUPER MURDEROUS KILLER PLANT was, in fact, Pulmonaria officinalis. Now, like every medicinal plant, Pulmonaria does contain some (very mild) toxins - if it doesn't have side effects, it doesn't have a main effect either - but you'd have to eat a lot of it, even as a small child. And it doesn't taste very nice, so why would one? So I said something like "Oh, you mean the lungwort? But that's hardly dangerous!"
"Lungwort? I thought it was dumbcane!" ---
The second story is from the hospital where my father works. One day, a terrified mother brought her son, who had supposedly eaten poisonous berries during recess. The biology teacher had identified the berries as hawthorn berries and declared an emergency. So the mother was called from her work and brought her son - who, frightened by all the fuss, of course had developed stomach cramps. Since hawthorn berries aren't even poisonous, the doctors were a little puzzled as to what might be causing the symptoms, so they asked the boy's friends to take a picture of the offending berries so they would be able to identify the poison correctly.
The photo, when it came, showed a redcurrant shrub. None of the people involved had been able to identify a F*CKING REDCURRANT.

So I suppose I should not get so worked up about the Impatiens incident - at least, it actually is a mildly poisonous plant - but ARGH. I hate this kind of unnecessary panic.

(Lastly, I'm also annoyed with the husband because I would never have taught a child that age to eat any part of Impatiens, because I KNOW how many people feel about those plants! But he thought it was an interesting thing for Julian to know. Well, today was certainly interesting!)

Now I just hope they won't break into a panic once it's properly autumn and Julian starts eating beechnuts (which are, in fact, slightly poisonous, though not in the tiny amounts Julian manages to pick open)...
oloriel: Darth Maul with a rainbow painted on his forehead. (sw - so happy i could shit rainbows)


Back from class trip. It was... probably a valuable experience.

The class is not easy to handle at the best of times, and three days in the back of the woods in cold, rainy weather is not the best of times. Here are some unsorted "high"lights.

- - -

The nature park where our school's class trip coordinator had booked our stay before I was at the school features various options of overnight stay, specifically the "African" village (which is actually more like a fort), the "Asian" village (pseudo-Mongolian yurts) and the "South American" village (which we didn't see). Also a guest house for posh functions and "tree houses" (not actually in the trees) for family vacations. The Powers That Be had decided that it was a good idea to book the yurts for a class trip in early April.

Now, of course, these are not real Mongolian yurts. They follow the construction principle, but they have none of the carpeting or insulation that make actual yurts a comfortable housing option during Mongolian winters. These yurts weren't even insulated enough to be comfortable during Bergian spring, which can (and will) be capricious. To counteract the nightly cold (just over 0°C these past days), real yurts would have a layered fire hole and a fire in the middle, which the park supplemented by putting electric fan blowers right next to the doors (the least insulated part of the yurt). You couldn't come up with a less energy-efficient way of heating if you tried. An interesting choice for a nature park supposedly intent to teach the kids eco-awareness.

- - -

Anyway. The "village" consisted of seven such pseudo-yurts: A "common room" for dining and meeting, four yurts for the students with eight beds each, and two yurts for the teachers with two beds each. Our class counts 24 students, eight of whom are girls and sixteen of whom are boys. Accordingly, we told them that the girls would have to squeeze into one hut and the sixteen boys would get the other three. Boys, please split into groups of five, five and six. The girls, after some grumbling about how they couldn't stand each other, accepted that. The boys were completely incapable of finding a combo that didn't leave several of them furious and/or crying. They were sitting in a circle in the "common room" and arguing all at once who could stay with whom and who hated whom and who absolutely didn't want to be without whom and so on. We told them that they didn't have to marry, they didn't even have to sleep in the same bed, they just had to share a room, for Chrissakes. To no avail. It was high drama.

So they sat in a circle, arguing and arguing, and I thoughtlessly said, "What we need is a Frodo."
Blank stare from my colleague, T.. I said, awkwardly, "You know, the movie scene of Elrond's council? Where they all sit in a circle bickering until Frodo steps forward."
"Never mind Frodo," T. said, "what we need is a Gimli." Then he went into the middle of the circle and announced, "If you guys don't find a solution right now, we'll give you just TWO huts at eight each, and the girls get to spread into the other two."
That finally did it. I guess sometimes you need an axe.

- - -

It would be exhausting to describe every crisis at length. Suffice it to say that we had several of them. The kids weren't cooperative in the games we had prepared, and some others that might have been more to their taste were ruined by the weather. So they were mopey anyway, and spent a lot of time in their respective huts. The eight girls, cooped up together, soon fell into two feuding parties, one of them made up of five cool girls (or rather, three cool girls and two followers) and the other made up of the three girls who the cool girls had decided were uncool. We observed this for a while, giving them time to settle the matter between themselves, but when the cool girls started to build a wall through their yurt out of benches and their luggage, reducing the other three girls to tears of despair in the common room, we decided to intervene. Cool Girl 1 was furious that a) the three uncool girls had tattled (which they hadn't; teachers aren't quite as stupid as CG1 seems to think) and b) that we teachers interfered in a matter that they could perfectly easily have settled themselves given enough time to cool down (which I doubt, because they kept on hotting each other up instead). We explained, as carefully as possible, that once three out of eight girls were crying (two more started crying in the course of these negotiations), the time for letting them settle it amongst themselves was past, especially in the light of certain walls built in certain places. T. further explained that in the history of mankind in general and the history of Germany in particular, the people who built dividing walls usually weren't the good guys, which CG1 didn't like at all.
It was a long and ultimately fruitless discussion that only ended when CG1 was tired of it and announced that they should make up and start over (which others had suggested before, but CG1 only likes suggestions that she makes. It's a pity, really: She's a bright young woman, one of the smartest in the class, but already so far into puberty that she wastes her wits on petty rebellion and selfish battles. She also pays very little attention in class because she's so caught up in being an influencer and on top of everyone's game.).

- - -

Hypersensitive Boy 1 needled Hypersensitive Boy 2 for so long until HB2 had an aggressive melt-down. After I had made sure that HB2 wouldn't hurt either himself or anyone else and had assigned a surprisingly helpful student to stay by HB2's side, I asked HB1 why he kept doing that (it wasn't the first time), considering how much he himself would hate it if someone did that to himself. "Oh," he replied, "that's completely different. I react psychologically and he reacts physically."
Yes, sweetheart, but it's still the same phenomenon.

- - -

Two kids had to be picked up. One was HB1. He couldn't sleep at night without a light, which for some reason he kept swinging around instead of, like, putting it next to his bed. So he was shining his flashlight at the other five kids in his yurt, who were understandably pissed off about it. We told HB1 to put his flashlight down. In a way that would provide light for him without shining at the others. "I can't," he said, "that way it would blind me!"
(It was like discussing things with Felix. >_>)
Anyway, after a few hours of this game he broke down because "everyone was criticising him" and got so homesick that we had to call his mother, who arrived aroudn midnight to pick him up. She brought him back the other day because she didn't want him to be an outsider for missing the class trip. Also because if he hadn't been there, he'd have had to go to school. HB1 later announced that his mother would have Words with Mrs. W., our supervisor, about how we wanted to force him to go to school if he hadn't attended the class trip.
I sincerely hope she will. I sincerely hope Mrs. W. gets to tell her that this is actually a provision of the educational law, not something that we pulled out of our asses to bully her poor kid.

The other boy had to be picked up because he was first seen pretending to hump a pillow while moaning the name of one of the girls in the class, and later for announcing that he'd go into the girls' yurt at night to get it on with another girl. He presumably meant it as a macho joke, but we decided to take it seriously, so he was officially Suspended From Class Trip.

- - -

One girl (of the three uncool girls) threw up that evening. Normally, the rule is that if a kid throws up, it has to be picked up, no matter whether the vomiting was actually induced by some form of contagious sickness or rather by eating too much chocolate, crisps and jelly babies (which is usually the cause of throwing up during a class trip). In this case, we decided that it was a result of the day's stress.

- - -

One boy fell out of the door window. It wasn't fixed properly and swung open, and instead of opening the door to close it, he hung out of the resulting opening and tried to pull it back in with his short arms. Instead, he fell through the window.
I am glad that it happened to this particular boy, not because I want bad things to happen to him (he's chaotic and cheeky, but otherwise fine), but because he practices judo. As such, he instinctively made a roll to minimise the impact of falling. Unfortunately, a perfect high roll onto gravel is still painful and he had some abrasions on his back and arm. But as a pilot of our acquaintance likes to say, any landing that you can walk away from is a good landing.

- - -

There is more, but I'm exhausted and don't want to write about it anymore. Suffice it to say that I'm glad to be home, that it was not a happy trip, and that I'm glad that colleague T. was calm and competent, because I felt out of my depth a ridiculous amount of times. I am no match for 24 eleven-year-olds.
oloriel: A comic style speech bubble declaring "Waking up this morning was a pointless act of masochism." (bad day)
Thank you for your kind words; they really helped me to calm down. And now you deserve the longer story.

It really was a very minor car crash. I was waiting at a traffic light to turn right. Traffic lights turned green, I started driving when I heard a siren and saw blue flashing lights approaching from the left. So I braked to let the ambulance pass. The driver behind me noticed too late and hit our car. Fortunately, he had only just been accelerating so the force of it wasn't too bad; we (that is, me and the kids) were hurtled ahead a bit, but not bad enough for serious whiplash or anything. Felix started crying because he thought the car was broken and would never drive again. Julian found the whole thing interesting. The driver behind me was under no illusion as to who was the guilty party, although in his defense he claimed he hadn't heard the ambulance. We called the police just to be on the safe side. Of course, the police said that if both parties agreed on what had happened and if there was no damage except to the concerned cars and no people injured, we were welcome to settle it amongst ourselves. Fair enough, but OTOH, you know what insurances are like, if you don't have an official report they'll always try to turn things around so the other side has to pay. So I'm glad the other driver (who had to pay a fine) agreed to call the police at once. As it happens, his family lives pretty close to our place, just up the hill. ("In the whole house next to the half house", in his words. It's a good description if you know the street!)

I'm mostly shaken by the fact that it happened at all, and by the fact that I'll have to contact the insurance and fuss this all out. I was really shaky afterwards. The kids, meanwhile, thought it was a nice adventure. Once Felix had understood that the car was still able to drive and that the damage could be repaired (it's very superficial on our car - a scratched and dented bumper - the other car looks worse - but it's frustrating because we only just bought it a few months ago!), he climbed up onto the embankment to watch the other cars, he gave a vivid account of the accident, and he was delighted that all this slowed our return home so much that he could see the streetlamps in the streets switched on. (He is still in love with lamps and lanterns.) Julian at first found everything too loud, but then he joined Felix in the climbing and lamp-gazing. He asked me to draw him a police car when we got home.

So yeah. We're fine. Just hoping that this has met our accident quota for this winter.
oloriel: A comic style speech bubble declaring "Waking up this morning was a pointless act of masochism." (bad day)
Well, a minor car crash was definitely what I needed to kick off the weekend. NOT.

(We're OK. The car is mostly OK. More (possibly) later when my hands have stopped shaking.)
oloriel: A Terry Pratchett quote: "Civilisation is only two meals away from chaos at the best of times", next to an egg and two laurel branches. (discworld - politics)
Well, Jörg and I we were both right, I guess.

Looking at the local data, there definitely seems to have been a surge of support for "local boy" Lindner (whose Liberal Democrats got 18.6 % of votes in our town, as opposed to 10.7% in the national average), but also some rising support for AfD (although it delights me to see that they "only" got 8.4% as opposed to the national average of 12.6%. Still too much, but.)

In that light, I suppose it may actually be a good thing (and not only sore loser mentality) that the Social Democrats have already announced that they will not stand ready for another "great coalition" with Merkel's Christian Democrats, but limit themselves to opposition instead. That way, the voice of the right-wing AfD will (presumably? if the SPD stick to their announcement?) be hemmed by a reasonably strong block of Social Democrats , and the third oppositional party will be the Left. So three quarters of the opposition will be made up of moderate to strong left-wing politicians which will hopefully keep the right-wing shenanigans down a bit. Hopefully.

---

What really apalls me is news like from Duisburg, where apparently they didn't have enough ballots (like hello? YOU KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO VOTE? AND AT WHICH POLLING STATION? Shouldn't they expect, just to be on the safe side, that 100% of voters show up? HOW THE HELL CAN YOU RUN OUT OF BALLOTS?) and voters had to wait for hours, or go home and return three times. This is how you discourage voters. This is how you drive voters to "protest vote" for the right-wing assholes. THIS IS HOW YOU DO IT WRONG.

Sheesh.

Yeah this will stop being a political blog any moment now but I had to ramble somewhere.
oloriel: (tolkien fandoms pwns all)


when designing dragons, there's a fine fine line between "terrifying" and "ridiculous".

[from the diary of Melkor, 223 F.A.]

Arghlblargh

Aug. 8th, 2017 08:20 pm
oloriel: (i did something stupid)
I'm physically sick with anxiety for one, or both, of two reasons.

- finished and posted the questionable meta/shipping manifesto/essay/thing. Well, probably pretentious enough to count as an essay. 44 references on six pages, WTF. Also, provocative much. And probably offending the wrong people. Why did I ever think this was a good idea. Time for the usual "They're gonna kick me out of fandom" angst and much internal hand-wringing etc. The canatics are going to kill me anyway.

- got a call from the bossman from hell. More angst. Turns out they pretty urgently need someone competent to do the calendar of events. Everything has gotten better since last year except that clearly it hasn't. (Between the lines, masked between plenty of "his qualities lie elsewhere" and "the trainee is helping out but you need solid general knowledge to do it right", it appears that the rest of the team just aren't up to it. Well, it is taxing, and the things that were supposed to make it easier last year actually made it worse, which has probably not changed.) Well, I know I can do the job. It wasn't the fun part of working at the magazine but it wasn't the worst either. The question isn't even "do I want to do it?" (To which the answer is "meh, but I don't terribly mind", which is prbly good enough?) The question is "should I sell my soul to that particular devil again" and. I just don't know.

Blargh.

LOL

May. 5th, 2017 06:30 pm
oloriel: (Og thinks you missed the point)
I just read the MOST STUPID THING on a friend's Tumblr (not written by the friend, just the start of a discussion that the friend reblogged). Granted, I read a LOT OF STUPID THINGS on Tumblr and I produce a lot of stupid things on LJ meself, but this was... special, so here it comes:

It sure is convenient that all these songs that ostensibly weren’t written in English all rhyme when translated into English, isn’t it, Mr. Tolkien?

...
...
...
...
...

Gosh. Yes. That sure breaks the suspension of disbelief! It sure is convenient that all these Shakespeare poems that ostensibly weren't written in German all rhyme when translated into German, isn't it? (Or French. Or Spanish. Or probably any language that does full rhymes, I expect?)
oloriel: (Patrick's Rune: Time for Heroism)


So the news have sunk in, and we're apparently not going to get a Groundhog Day style miracle, and the world will have to keep on turning.

And I have to admit that right now, some of what I hear from the non-Trump voters is almost as scary as the fact that Trump has won the election. (Or the electoral college? Or maybe they'll vote differently in December after all? I DO NOT GET THIS SYSTEM BUT THEN, I SHOULD NOT HAVE TO.)

I understand that the reality of it must be horrible if you're actually living in America and belong to a minority group (including, apparently, academics --- ow! what?!) or are a woman or *gasp* both. I realise that a lot of the things I'm seeing from my distant storm-threatened hill in the not entirely calm fields of Europe may look different from the eye of the hurricane. And I certainly get that a lot of the reactions I'm seeing from those who voted (or would have voted) for Clinton (or Other) are kneejerk reactions born out of disappointment, or very real fears.

But.

When I see people gathering for anti-Trump protests in the streets, I cannot help but wonder what these same people would be saying if things had been different, and Trump voters were heading out for anti-Clinton rallies. Look at them, can't even accept the result of a democratic election. Typical for them...
Yeah, well.

When I see people seriously considering emigration to Canada or New Zealand or Australia or the UK (um, the UK is actually not such a happy place right now, from what I hear; but sure, add a heavy wave of migration to their Brexit issues, I'm sure that's gonna go down well), I can't help but wonder who will be left to heal the wounds and protect those who cannot leave and write letters to their senators and try to move things back in the right direction. Nobody, apparently. And I can't help thinking that most people will serve their country and the world and, ultimately, themselves - emigration, I hear, is not a fun business - better by staying where they are and doing what they can.
(Unless, obviously, they're under actual threat, in which case, do try to get the hell outta there.)

When I see people posting on Tumblr that everyone who voted for Trump please (or not please) unfollow them, I actually facepalm. Because yes, Trump gives the impression of being a horrible person in a lot of ways, and his racism, sexism and sheer popularism are enough to terrify anyone, but he's still a human being, and so are the people who voted for him. I realise it's hard to stop and consider this - especially on Tumblr, where the "other side" never appears to be made up of human beings - but by blocking them from your friendslists or whatever the things are called on Tumblr, you'll only suggest to them that feminists, people of whatever ethnic background that isn't white, people who aren't (US) American, academics or people who believe in climate change are sore loosers and elitist and out of touch with the working/ middle classes or whatnot and refusing to engage in dialogue. Instead of showing them that uh, no, black lesbian feminists with a college education (or whatever else) are actually totally normal, quite reasonable people who may have interesting things to say and reasons to say them. Look, people are not gonna listen to media from the other side or read long eloquent articles about just why Trump was a bad choice, no matter how true they are. But they might absorb something from someone who's in the same fandom or shares their obsession with figure skating or their love for gardening or whatever. There's the adage of "keep your friends close, but your enemies closer" and while I don't think you should consider these people enemies - because a lot of them may not, in fact, be sexist or racist or whatever, but just frustrated and uninformed - I think it applies now, too. You may be needing the bridges you're burning right now.

And that's the bad thing about these perfectly understandable kneejerk reactions, they are already burning bridges and causing damage. Because looking back, the people who are happy with the result of this election will always be able to point their finger and say "See, they don't want to play by the rules either, they hit the streets and rioted, too, so why should we do any different?", and they'll be sorta right. Because if you unfollow/unfriend everyone who happened to vote for Trump, the rift is only getting deeper. In the end, there'll just be a neat community of Trump supporters re-assuring and re-asserting themselves, with no information trickling in from outside (or if anything does trickle inside, it'll be easily stamped down in the way that every critical thought is stamped down in a Tumblr crusade).

So yeah. This is a bad, bad, BAD result and you have every reason to be angry and scared and to feel like lashing out. And I totally get the urge to disconnect from anybody who may be responsible for it, but it's not going to make things better. In fact, I'm worried that it has already begun to make things worse.

Sorry, had to get this out of my system. I know it's none of my business, really, sitting on, as I said, my little hill in the wide fields of Europe (haha). But as news about the election is everywhere, and as things that happen in the US tend to have an impact on the whole world, it's a bit of my business after all.

I hear things about an Interstate Popular Vote Compact and about writing letters to various electorals, which sounds like a route more fruitful than, you know, kicking the two or three Trump voters you can actually reach off your friendslist. At least in the long run. So look into that. And stay safe. And sane. Have a cup of tea or a good bubble bath or a pedicure treatment. Have a binge reading of Harry Potter or, if that's too uncomfortable right now, read fluffy fanfic until your eyes water. Or stay away from the internet for a while. Chop some wood. Bake a cake and eat it, too. Whatever makes you feel better. Hugs.
oloriel: (firefly - define interesting.)
is NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.

My heartfelt condolences to the Americans on my flist. We have to watch this shit from afar, but you have to deal with it first-hand. Hang in there! This too shall pass! (I sincerely hope.)
oloriel: (asoiaf - hear me whine)


Will I ever catch up? Probably not! But I will try.

First off, though, Happy extremely belated birthdays, [livejournal.com profile] dawn_felagund and [livejournal.com profile] lindahoyland!
I hope both of you had wonderful days and continue to have a wonderful year. Congrats on the new kitten, [livejournal.com profile] lindahoyland, Reuben is adorable!

Now, on to real-life matters. A lot of things going on, so I'll start with the explanation for the cryptic "Smeagol is free!" post. As it happens, Smeagol is not in fact wholly free, but everybody hopes that the situation can be resolved without anyone jumping into a volcano.
It concerned (concerns) the job situation with the "lovely" regional magazine.

(The magazine actually is lovely. Working there was lovely, until I realised that it's predominantly a means to further bossman's ambitions of being famous, admired and influential. Bossman himself may, as yet, be the most horrible human being I have personally encountered. But I'm getting ahead of myself.)

You may recall that back in June, I was looking at the question of whether I would continue working at the magazine, or would they dump me because it had transpired that I would not be able to put in 20+ hours of office work (and about the same time in home office or attending events). At the time, boss-colleague had just been fired (unfairly, but to his great relief) and I was torn between the desire to do the job (which I enjoyed) and to get away from bossman's schemes (which I was beginning to see through and detest). As it happened, bossman seemed to realise that for the time being, the existence of the magazine depended on someone stupid enough to continue doing my job, because finding someone to replace boss-colleague turned out to be a lot harder than he thought. So the suggestion was to come to the office once a week (6-8 hours) and do everything that could be done from home from home (another 16 hours). And I figured that hey, even if bossman is an absolute asshole, some form of part-time job security might be nice. So I officially got out of the traineeship, but immediately got into a new position as an editorial assistant. There was a brief period of psychological games, in which bossman tried to make me feel guilty to accept lower pay. I should have packed up and gone right then, but I didn't. I thought it was enough that I had understood that it was just a psychological game, and figured that I could try to play one of my own, in which I'd continue to be indispensable to the magazine until the kids were old enough for me to officially become the boss-colleague. Because bossman is almost 70, it would only be a matter of time until he would (have to?) retire, and then I'd sort of slip into the position of bosswoman. It was not a terribly well-thought out plan, but I didn't have any more exciting perspective at the time (short of Finally Finishing One Of My Book Projects And Getting Them Published), so it was worth a shot. Besides, I didn't want to let the two ad ladies down. As for the pay, bossman claimed that he couldn't offer me more than 600 bucks for the abovementioned 22-24 hours of weekly work because there was a new boss-colleague about to start who had loads of work experience and wouldn't do the job for as little as J., the old boss-colleague. I said in that case, I'd do significantly less home office work in order to approximate minimum wage at least.

Okay. I hate bragging or anything that vaguely sounds like it, but let's be absolutely blunt here: The magazine is still existing only thanks to that move, because I kept the editorial side of things from slipping into absolute chaos (although it continued to be chaos), managed to find topics to fill the pages, kept the homepage up to date and actually, like, read the effing flood of e-mails that arrived in bossman's inbox every day that he never got read because he has the attention span of a particularly ill-tempered cat. Two editions of the magazine have only appeared because I have been keeping things running in the background, even though I only wrote just two contributions to one edition (I actually wrote four, but only two ended up in the magazine; maybe the other two will appear in the next, which was due last week but hasn't yet?). I drove around to do interviews and fed the ever-hungry events calendar. The one thing I didn't do was feed Facebook, which ended up being the new trainee's job, and take care of the ads, which was the job of the ad ladies.

At the same time, the refugee newspaper took up much of bossman's time. The Syrian guys had wanted to publish it in time for Ramadan, which didn't work out. They had wanted to publish is immediately after Ramadan, which didn't work out. I don't know whose fault this was but it meant that some articles that had been prepared could no longer be used, that the events calendar had to be reworked three times, and that the list of markets that the old boss colleague and I were asked to assemble on his last day in the office (one week before the normal magazine was due, I might add). Anyway, bossman was completely swamped with that. If you asked him about anything else (or even about anything related to the refugee newspaper), he would yell that he didn't want to be disturbed, and then continued to rage for half an hour about how he can't even do one single thing without someone asking stupid questions. I was supposed to point out relevant e-mails and events to him on my one office day, which got pushed off until after lunch, next hour, next week; and next week, half of them were over. "Why didn't you tell me about that?" I tried. "Someone should have gone there!" Then you should have authorised that. "You don't need me to authorise that, you have to make that decision on your own!" Okay.
This will be relevant later.

The normal edition of the magazine was finished just before I left for Drachenfest (meaning that I wouldn't be there to proofread it, but never mind, he had a freelancing proofreader for that). The proofreader was fuming when I came back because apparently, bossman had changed things around after she had finished the job, using the old (un-proofed and error-ridden) versions of the articles. But never mind: The magazine was out once again, and it was time for a breather... OR WAS IT?
As it happened, the first edition of the refugee newspaper had also finally been printed and put into the shops (unlike the normal magazine, it was sold - at a low price, but at a price - and not given out for free. A totally sensible way of doing things). In celebration of this, our "resident cook" (actually a friend of the refugee newspaper's official editor-in-chief; he contributed one recipe to the newspaper) was asked to prepare a little Syrian feast at bossman's home. He did this splendidly, and we feasted together and toasted the future of the magazine and I was lulled into a sense of look, bossman actually can be nice when he isn't swamped.

UNTIL. Two things happened in the days after the feast. The day immediately after, one of the ad ladies called me to ask whether I could drive with the new trainee to do two interviews in GM (one hour's drive away on a good day). That was a Thursday, the one day when I have absolutely nobody to watch the kids at any time of the day, so I said sorry, I really can't, but nonetheless asked what this was about: To the best of my knowledge, bossman had meant to do that interview. (He had planned to take the new trainee along so she could learn journalism. The new trainee was absolutely lovely and willing to put up with a lot of shit and extremely diligent, but she was not exactly a natural as a writer.)
Yeah, ad lady #1 said, that's a bit difficult. He told the trainee yesterday evening that he can't actually come along, as was planning on doing a test ride.
A test ride? asks I, naïvely. Oh, for the "motor" section of the magazine?
Not that I know of, says ad lady, who would know because she's the one who negotiates the deals with the car dealers. I don't know anything about this, ad lady reiterates, so I'm a bit desperate and a bit angry.
Well, I'm really sorry, but I honestly can't help today.
That's OK, it's not my fault, says ad lady. She's going to send an angry text message to bossman so he gets his butt out of whatever car he wants to test ride and into a car to GM.
Okay.

The next day, I get a call from the trainee. She's really sorry but could I do two interviews in GM? She rescheduled yesterday's appointments after bossman didn't appear and couldn't be reached, but apparently he's been hospitalised so he can't go today, either.
What, I ask, alarmed, did he have an accident?
Nobody knows, says the trainee.
What about yesterday's test ride, did he shed any light on that?
He says there was no test ride, I must have misheard that, says the trainee.
Misheard, my ass, I think, but I say out loud, then why was he hospitalised?
He was talking about sciatic pain, says the trainee. Can you go to GM?
Actually, if she'd called an hour earlier (or told me the day before), I could have gone; but as it was, I just told the mother-in-law that she's free to do whatever she wants because I only have computer work to do. So I can't. Besides, I'm envisioning bossman being hit by lumbago while trying to get into (or out of) a Lamborghini, which would certainly reconcile the combination of "test ride" and "sudden unbearable sciatic pain". I don't really feel like picking up the pieces (again) because bossman went on an ego trip. I don't tell the trainee that; she's young and naïve, but she's also a good friend of bossman's daughter.
OK, says the trainee, I guess I'll just reschedule it again then. Acts of Nature, that sort of thing.
That evening, very strangely, the very same bossman who is supposedly in too much pain to be driven to GM (the trainee may not have too much skill as a journalist, but she's got both a driver's licence and a car) can be seen on the local news, walking around the office, subtly showing off the print of Nelson Mandela and the wood sculpture by a local sculptor and humbly answering questions about the awesomeness of the refugee magazine, into which he put a lot of money of his own but it's all gonna pay off. And these local news clips are prepared on the same day on which they're aired. Honi soit qui mal y pense. Of course, his new prestige project is more important than anything.

Bits of news trickle down the wire over the course of the next week. Bossman was hospitalised with lumbago. No, there never was a test ride or anything of the sort, he just couldn't get up in the morning. He had to be taken to the hospital straight from his bed. No, actually it wasn't lumbago. The sciatic nerve is inflamed. No, actually that's not it, either, it's a herniated disc. No, actually nobody knows what it is, because the hospital bossman wanted to go to because he knows all the important people there doesn't have its own MRI specialist. There is one coming in from Cologne, but he only comes once a week and he hasn't been in yet.
I try to bite back my thoughts on "knowing all the important people" (something bossman always insisted I needed to do), but something may slip out in my eyes or voice. Ad lady #2 gives me a knowing smile and says "It's all extremely nebulous, I know, and I'm fed up. Also, in two weeks, we need to send the special edition to the printer."
The special edition appears twice a year and is all about young people in more or less interesting occupational training jobs, helping companies to find the next generation of trainees and graduates to find traineeships. How interesting these jobs are depends on where the ad ladies secure the ads that finance the special edition. To be fair, some of them are honestly interesting, and others are made interesting by the happy faces of the young trainees as they talk about how they've found their dream job, unexpectedly or expectedly. I've done a couple of these interviews and, aside from giving me a hard reality check on my own age, they've generally been good fun. The hardest part is cutting the interviews down to 1500-character snippets, and producing photos of the kids at their workplace that aren't just "somebody staring at a computer screen" or "somebody fixing a loose screw". This used to be the old prestige project, and now that the first edition of the new prestige project (which is not a success; it meets with much admiration, but over half of the 30.000 copies continue to sit in the office. Syrian editor-in-chief expected as much and suggested that 5.000 copies would be enough for a first attempt and it might be better to hand them out for free, but bossman "knew better") is done, it has once more become the most important thing in the world.

"Yeah, about that," I say, "I don't think I can schedule any more interviews than the five I already have going on this week."
She sighs. "I had hoped that you had already scheduled a few more that weren't on the list."
"If I had scheduled more, they would be on the list. I always update that list. So you know what you don't have to worry about anymore."
"Yeah, that's good. But the list isn't reliable because bossman keeps checking it from home and he never saves the most recent version somehow. Anyway, we still need to get 20 additional interviews done and I'd really hoped you could help us with that. Bossman has already yelled at me for selling so many ads but what can I do? Last week he yelled at me for not having sold enough."
I know how it is. I agree to additionally do the interviews that the trainee had to reschedule twice, but that's all I can do.

Bossman manages to find a freelancer who does the missing interviews. Actually, the freelancer is going to be a fixed part of the editorial team. Actually, the freelancer is going to become the new boss colleague. I don't like him that much but some of that may be misplaced loyalty with the old boss colleague. At any rate, he gets some of the job done. He also has two small kids, twins, who are Felix' age. So he isn't going to take any shit about random additional work hours out of the usual. I sometimes overhear him talking to his wife on the phone, and although he always tries to be smart and ironic and totally cool, I get the impression that he loves his wife and his son and daughter deeply and is not going to give them up in order to Breathe The Magazine, as bossman expects. So I sense difficult times ahead for him, but also have some hope that bossman may be forced to show that his expectations just can't be reconciled with reality in spite of "But the OLD editor-in-chief did it all!" (Yes, and the old editor-in-chief had neither significant other nor children and STILL resigned into unemployment because he just couldn't take the shit any longer.) Because if the same problem keeps on reappearing, maybe you're part of the problem? It's probably too much to ask, but hey, either way, it's nice to have someone else sharing in the load, even if he's a bit too smart and ironic for my tastes. (But his twin children are named Luke and Leia. I SHIT YOU NOT.)

Meanwhile, bossman is still in the hospital and nobody exactly knows what he's suffering from or what's getting done. But when his painkillers work, he's well enough to remote control all the office macs, search for stuff that's exactly where it should be, moving things around and messing up whatever vestige of order everyone has established on their computer because it doesn't fit his idea of how things should be. (He often does that, remote-controlling the office macs. I have regularly found articles posted online under my name, or e-mails sent with my signature, because he couldn't bother to switch accounts after having filed through something on the main computer, which is currently the one I use.)
Other than that, he is blessedly absent, and thus, we get the special edition pretty much prepared. The one problem is that bossman wants to change the layout a bit. This is a problem because the old designer resigned even before the editor-in-chief (old OLD boss colleague) did, the new designer was put on unpaid leave after a couple of weeks, and the Syrian designer is suddenly no longer good enough because bossman has to explain what he wants in English, which takes too long. (After bossman first insisted that the Syrian designer could do it all because he was, like, the best designer in all of Aleppo and we were so lucky to have him here. I later learn that the Syrian designer has also been put on supposedly unpaid leave - ad lady #2, who also happens to be HR lady, had to fight like a lioness to make bossman pay him the money he owed - and left swearing that he'd never do a single favour to this man again.) So bossman will do it himself.
From hospital. On his iPad. Whenever the painkillers work. And then he'll feed all the content we've produced into it, don't you worry.

I worry, and I worry rightly, because after he has changed the layout, suddenly the interview snippets only get to be 1250 characters long. I've carefully pruned them to be 1500 characters, the old length, and that already meant cutting about half of what I originally wrote. OH WELL. With the new boss colleague - let's call him Skywalker - in office, I also loose my privileges on the main mac and never get them assigned on the other computer, so I can't actually access the server (either to look up or to save things) but have to do it all via e-mail. Oh well.
Also, bossman rewrites some of the interviews that he doesn't find interesting enough (only one of mine, incidentally, and eleven of Skywalker's. SORRY, BUT THAT'S HOW IT IS.) "Those kids don't know what to talk about, so you have to put interesting things in their mouths." After that, the layouted interviews are sent to the companies - who, technically, have paid for these interviews by the ads they publish in the magazine, so they get a say in how their trainees present them in the magazine. The nicer ones also show them to the trainees who thus get a chance to say "I never said that" or "that's not what I meant". To everybody's total surprise, most of the interviews that bossman rewrote come back with requests for change because "XY says he never said that". NO WAI.
To nobody's surprise, this is completely the fault of me, the freelancers, and Skywalker.
Oh well.

Somehow, the special edition gets assembled anyway. Somehow, bossman also gets out of hospital. One of my office days, I come in and he sits in his place. His long flowing artist's mane has been replaced by a short stubble. Do they shave your head when they fix something on your sciatic nerve? Isn't that, like, on the other end? LOOK IT'S NOT MY PLACE TO SPECULATE BUT THINGS JUST DON'T ADD UP HERE. Anyway, bossman is furious that I am here. "I sent you an e-mail yesterday afternoon that there's no computer for you today. The proofreader is coming in an hour. You need to go away."
(Which, btw, is bullshit, because the designer mac is no longer used after the Syrian designer was sacked, and the proofreader is going to use the trainee's desk because it's got the faster computer and the trainee is in trade school all day. So there are, in fact, two empty desks. But never mind.)
I affect cheerfulness. "That's fine, I've got an appointment in an hour, too."
"What sort of appointment?" he asks sharply. So I explain about the invitation the magazine got, for a rebuilding scheme in a run-down quarter of the next town over. They're planning to build lots of modern housing units with cheap flats for the socially disadvantaged. It's the kind of topic that bossman normally loves, because he wants to be seen as the great benefactor and voice of social justice. In the light of his utter social ineptitude, this is rather a joke, but there it is.
"That's boring," he decides, "where's the story there?" Well, relocating the folk who currently live in that quarter, how do they feel about that? tearing down the old houses, how do other locals feel about that? bringing in new people from various "disadvantaged" background, is there a danger of ghettoisation? I'm sure there's some kind of story here. "Well, OK." he says. And then he turns back to feeding in the edited interviews for the special edition.
Half an hour later - the proofreader has just arrived - he runs after me as I want to leave for the appointment. "Actually, you don't have to go there. Who authorised that, anyway?"
Nobody did. The invitation has been put into my inbox by ad lady #1, who assumed that it might be relevant because Houses and Building is one of the chief topics for the next normal edition. Bossman told me two months ago not to wait for authorisation, but to make decisions myself. I made a decision, backed up by ad lady #1.
"No, you can't just do that without authorisation."
OK, then I won't.
"Besides, you shouldn't be here. I sent you an e-mail yesterday morning that you won't be needed today."
That's fine, I'll go home. But I never got that e-mail, and I worked on the computer until 6 PM last night. Incidentally, he said he'd sent it yesterday afternoon just an hour ago.
"I sent it sometime yesterday, and you should have read it."
(Even as a freelancer, I actually don't have to read work-related e-mails outside of "normal office hours".)
Whatever.

On my way home, I remember that I have another appointment looming on Saturday. I actually did ask for authorisation on that in June, and bossman said that it should be done, but only after the special edition had come out. Which will be this week, so I made the appointment for the weekend. But with bossman horrible at remembering agreements, I figure it's better to ask for authorisation again. So I do that once I'm back home.
No reply.
I do my usual home office work, and also ask again what to do about the appointment on Saturday.
On Friday, he finally replies to ask what sort of appointment it is. (I actually explained all about that in my first e-mail, but reading comprehension is clearly not everyone's cuppa.) So I explain it all again.
No reply.
Friday night, as I come back from a birthday party, I find a message on my phone. "We don't need that." That's all.
I should be glad - it's the weekend of the grand fair in town, and the kids are eager to spend as much time there as possible - but I am pissed off that he first authorised this, now knows nothing about it, and then wants to call it off at the last minute. So I text him back: "You really want me to cancel this on such short notice?"
No reply until Saturday noon - two hours before the appointment! "Yes, cancel it. I'd need a sports photographer for this and I don't have one. Besides, we're scrapping the sports series."
This is news to me, and I try to politely point out that the people I'm going to interviews are providing the photos - the sporting events they attend take place all over Germany and, in fact, Europe, so bossman wouldn't pay a photographer to go there, anyway. I mentioned this in my previous explanatory e-mails but, you know.
Then I go and do the interview. For one, I would have found it too impolite to cancel the appointment with only two hours warning; for two, I know that bossman often changes his mind about things and then he's going to want me to interview these people after all, so I may as well get it done now.
And it's fun. Partly, I have to admit, because it feels like open rebellion and that's kind of satisfying, but also because the topic turns out to be really fascinating. I'm not a fan of motorised sports but these people sell their sport (sidecar motorbike trials) well, and it's more about reading the terrain and dexterity than speed, and after the interview is done, I get to attempt it myself. I am probably doing a really poor job and my muscles cramp something fierce afterwards, but it's FUN, like a rollercoaster that you get to steer yourself. If I were ten years younger (or twenty years older) and had no other obligations, I'd totally take it up myself. I may not get paid for this interview, but I don't honestly care because it was just fun.
And afterwards, Jörg and I take the kids to the fair. My parents also come along and pay for all the rides, long after what we would have granted, so the kids enjoy it immensely. Felix has come to enjoy speed and racing relatively recently; Julian has loved it pretty much from the start. He'd greatly enjoy sidecar motorbike trial runs, too, I suspect. He'll probably take up training with the folks I have just interviews in a couple of years' time (their own daughter rode her first motorbike when she was five), and my poor nerves will never get a moment's rest. Because our town is taking part in a free w-lan scheme, I can read my e-mails on my phone, and so I can immediately read a surprisingly long mail from the bossman. Basically, I'm free to do the interview at my own peril - oh really - and can try to sell the article - "which he expects I will write really well, as usual" - why thanks - to the magazine afterwards. But it all depends on the quality of the photos. The old editor-in-chief photographed everything himself and he did so splendidly, but neither the old boss-colleague nor the new boss-colleague nor I can match him, which is why bossman wants to scrap the sports series in the first place. Besides, he feels that I am lacking in the communications department (look who's talking) and too stubborn (yes, I can be that) and prone to insubordination (that actually depends on the person in charge; towards him, I absolutely am), so he'd prefer if in the future, I only write articles and he only pays me for those. From now on, I am released from all other duties like office time, the events calendar and e-mail hell. Would I please send him a list of my work hours this month so he doesn't pay me too much.

It is a beautiful sunny day, the kids are having the time of their life, and I smile and pocket my smart phone.
We eat at the fair. I take care of the garden. It's the end of August, summer has finally arrived, and I am free.

The next Tuesday, I get a distraught call from ad lady #1. "The distributor for your town has resigned, and the distributor for the next town over is in hospital. We've already scheduled you for your town on your office day tomorrow, but could you maybe also do the next town over? Or the other one that also is no longer covered?"
...
...
...
I ask whether bossman didn't tell her that he "released me from all duties", including office time (not to mention that distributing the printed magazines was never one of my duties in the first place). She is completely flabberghasted. "He said you were still in tomorrow, because it's the last day of August," she says. "He paid you until the end of the month, he said."
I wonder if this is true - bossman normally never pays on time - and tell her that bossman sent me an e-mail that definitely says "from now on", meaning Saturday, the Xth of August, 4:12 PM.
She swears and announces her intentions of kicking bossman's ass.
I say that I'm in a real conundrum: I'd love to help her and the team, who are - once more - in a difficult situation; I will absolutely not help bossman, who brought the situation about.
"No, I wouldn't, either," she says tiredly. "But we're gonna miss you."
I talk to the other ad lady later, because she's also HR lady. "He can't actually fire you on such short notice," she says, "but of course he can put you on leave, as he did in his e-mail." Not unpaid leave, though, so I don't actually have to list all the time I spent working for the magazine. (It is only slightly less than would amount to my usual € 600 if minimum wage is applied, and would have been more if I hadn't stopped last Saturday. Actually, if the interviews I did for the special edition, it would have been a lot more. I tell her that.) "List it, then," ad lady suggests. "Bossman always claims he's paying people too much so he can use some setting straight."
Bossman also calls, later on. "OF COURSE you were supposed to come in tomorrow! I would never fire anyone without proper notice!"
I know. You can't. But you did put me on leave.
"I meant after the month is over! Obviously! I didn't need to state that because that's how it's done!"
I don't fall for his 'that's how it's done' shit. "You explicitly said 'from now on'. That's last Saturday in the afternoon."
Silence. He probably checks his e-mail and realises that oh shit, that's what he wrote. He hates writing e-mails. He loves making unwritten agreements and later forgetting what he said, or what the other side said. Not necessarily on purpose, just because it "works better for him". Of course it does. But now, he put it into writing.
"Hmpf. What about the interviews?"
"Oh, that went really well. It's quite an exciting story. They're multiple German and European champions, so they really know what they're doing. If they win another race in October, they'll hold the title for seven years in a row."
"Hmpf."
"The photos are also pretty nice, as far as I can judge that."
"Well, it's not just about the quality, it's also about whether we have the photographer's permission" - which we do - "and about whether they've been published before, where, in what media and so on."
These would normally be legitimate concerns, but it's the first time since I've been working at the magazine that he suddenly worries about that sort of thing, so I understand he's doing his usual games again.
"I am sure they will give me that information. No problem," I say cheerfully. And because I can be mean, I also say, "I suspect a spectacular motorbike pic might be nice material for the cover, even. After the homely covers for the last two editions..."
This is a sore spot, I know, because the ad ladies have complained about the homely covers already. Their customers think that they looked like something for "The Modern Housewife" or "Town and Country" or somesuch, not the hip, smart image they - and bossman - normally pursue.
And indeed, it works. "You can send me a couple of photos," he says, "and I'll see what we can use."
Sure. I'll send him downsized previews of the photos to give him a first impression. The real photos, of course, will only come after he has bought the article.
"Yeah, about payment," he says. "I've already paid you for August but I guess you can just send back the amount that is too much."
"Actually, there isn't anything to send back," I say. "I have listed my hours and if we go by minimal wage, that's 575 bucks. But you haven't paid my travel expenses for the past three months yet, so in fact, you still owe me money."
"We never agreed on minimal wage!"
"We never agreed on any hourly rate."
"We agreed that you'd do 22 hours per week, and I'd pay you 600 € per month!"
"We agreed that I'd do home office, and you'd pay me 600 € per month. I told you that I'd do less than 22 hours in order not to sell myself short."
"This is getting too complicated. Bye." He hangs up.

A couple of passive aggressive e-mails follow the next couple of days. The photos can't be used, are too small (YES, THEY ARE DOWNSIZED PREVIEWS), show the wrong things, the perspective is boring, he wants something different. I probably totally shock him by NOT begging him to take the photos or the article. If he doesn't want them, too bad, so sad. Maybe I'll ask the folks' permission to offer the article to other magazines or the local paper. Or I'll just let them know that the series was scrapped, very sorry. I can't currently bring myself to care.
More bullshit follows, and I still haven't seen the ~ 200 bucks he still owes me, so, yeah. This may not be over yet.
But for the time being, I'm just glad to have my freedom back. Even though I only worked at the office once per week, the home office ate up pretty much all my computer time (and some spare time that I would otherwise have used differently), and thinking about organisational issues and articles and topics consumed much of my mind even when I was doing other things. I actually still catch myself thinking THAT WOULD BE MATERIAL FOR -- OH WAIT when I see notices for events or hear about interesting people/projects/issues going on. (I also have discovered that there appears to be a direct competitor to the magazine. It's even doing the same special edition. It's doing less well because it's meant to be sold, and people don't wanna pay, and also, it's not the same level of journalism, which was what initially attracted me with the other magazine. Even though it's supposed to be not predominantly financed by ads, the commercial aspects are a lot more obvious in the content. But who knows? I might apply there. Maybe that'll raise the level of writing, hah, hah.)

In theory, bossman wants me to continue writing articles for his magazine every now and then. "You do awesome writing, you're just a bad team player". I don't yet know whether he plans to send me suggestions for topics and ask me to write on them, or whether I am supposed to write stuff and send it in "for his consideration". I am not going to do the latter, at least not now, while the anger is fresh (and probably not later, because the husband will remind me of the anger -- he's a bit smug that he was right all along, which is really too cheap and too simple, but there's no point in arguing the point). I just have no effs left to give for this matter. (I used more chopsticks than I really have for finally writing this entry. I have no clue whether it's readable, but I can't even bring myself to re-read it. If we didn't have guests tonight, I'd spend the rest of the day slouching in front of the computer, re-reading Another Man's Cage until my eyes cross and I accidentally address Felix as Feanor, not that this has ever happened before or anything.)

Oh well. (Yet again!) Maybe you can make sense of it anyway. If not, oh well. I am trying to save all my effs for November. Does the above look like material for a 50K novel to you? It does to me. If I change the names and fictionalise the region...? It would be my first non-Fantasy or Travel NaNo. :P

Swamped

Jun. 11th, 2016 04:03 pm
oloriel: (firefly - define interesting.)
May was a month full of excitement. I worked at the office every Wednesday, then I was asked to also come in on Friday, which I managed to do, and then it was DEADLINE week and panic time. In spite of deadline week Wednesday being a regional holiday (Corpus Christi), I went in to work from 9 to 8. (That's 11 hours. German work law officially draws the line at 10.) Hey, the magazine's gotta be finished, right? I also went in on Friday. Oh, and Saturday afternoon. And I kept on feeding the events calendar at home, which isn't even figuring into the calculation. And then I did some proofreading Sunday night.

In short, I thought I was just helping to push the magazine over the deadline in time in a once-in-two-months frenzy. Which is mostly due to bossman's amazingly poor organisational skills, I mean, honestly, he's like a kid with ADS in a candy store. Oh well. It was sort of exhausting, but it only happens in deadline week, right? And it was also vaguely satisfying. As a once-in-two-months thing.

Except apparently it's expected to put in this kind of effort every single week day.
Ahahah, no. I signed up for part-time work, about 25 hours INCLUDING visits to events and meetings and stuff AND home office. I've already worked over 100 hours for the magazine in May (for free!), although only 60 of those are documented.

Now it's June, and I'm getting paid for 25 hours a week. That's OK... except.

Except that the childcare situation is more complicated than I would have expected. Seriously, it's crazy. When the new kindergarten term starts, both kids have a place. But term officially starts on August 1, which is in the middle of the summer holidays, three weeks of which the kindergarten observes. So in reality, term starts on August 22. And then the first week or two will be acclimatisation time, in which I'll have to stay with Julian. So it'll only really help from September onwards.
Until September? I've found nothing, short of hiring a nanny, which is sort of not worth it.
Still, I've been hoping and searching and making calls. Until then, the mother-in-law has honestly done as much as was possible. In spite of her cardiovascular issues and her tendency to stress over everything. There are a lot of things that drive me batty about M-I-L, but she really, really tried to help.
But part of the agreement was that she could nonetheless do her normal courses and attend her social meetings, concerts and stuff. So I had to leave the office on time.

It just isn't possible. Bossman keeps jumping from one thing to the next and just when you're getting out of the door, SOMETHING REALLY IMPORTANT that you've been asking him for hours (or, in some cases, two days ago) NEEDS TO BE SETTLED RIGHT THEN. So I began "leaving" half an hour before I actually had to leave, so I more or less really got out of the office on time, if that makes sense. It worked sometimes, but not always.

To make things more complicated, as soon as the magazine was with the printer, bossman handed boss colleague (who replaced the old boss colleague) his two weeks notice (boss colleague was still in his probationary phase - he started just a month before me). Because boss colleague was "overtaxed and not pulling his weight". It is true that he was overtaxed, as anyone would be when more or less dumped into a running system and having to run with it with no time to find one's feet. However, he was also doing a shitload of work, staying in the office until late at night, and not driving home to see his family (= wife and a three-year-old daughter). Because he was trying to prove worthy. Well, bossman found him unworthy and fired him. Boss colleague is actually relieved, because that means he doesn't have to resign and he knew that he would have done that as soon as possible. So that's good for him. It's bad for me because I really liked him as a person. We shared a lot of geeky jokes, we built each other up when bossman's expectations were impossible to fulfill, and he actually did a lot of work in the background that bossman just never noticed.
Well, he's noticing now, because some of these tasks I wasn't even aware of existed. (Because I'm the trainee, remember? And because these tasks weren't the top priority while the last issue of the magazine was in its finishing stages, nobody told me about them.) So I wasn't doing them. So after a week, bossman actually noticed that they were not getting done. "Why is nobody sharing articles on Facebook? Why is nobody attending this or that meeting? Why did nobody tell me about XYZ?" BECAUSE NOBODY KNEW THESE THINGS HAD TO BE DONE. BECAUSE ACTUALLY, YOU'RE THE BOSS AND YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO SHOW ME THE ROPES, RATHER THAN EXPECTING ME TO INTUIT THEM.

(Granted, I intuited a lot of things. I was a natural at feeding the events calendar - duh, it's using Wordpress and I've been blogging for how long now? - and I had no problem working with either GIMP (duh, I've been making basic but adequate icons and banners and scans for how long now?) or InCopy (I got lucky?) or boiling a 2000 word text down to 800 words (WELL I WONDER WHERE I LEARNED THAT). So apparently, I have to intuit EVERYTHING?)

Anyway. It's not my fault that things are no longer getting done, because as far as I am concerned, if you expect that one untrained person can, in 20 hours a week, do the same job as two untrained people in 60+ hours (who already had to do the same job as one trained person in 60+ hours), you deserve it when shit blows up in your face. I know it's not a nice thing to say, and I'm really sorry for the other team members, but as far as bossman is concerned, I'm kind of happy that he's noticing now that he can't expect everything to work out to his expectations WITHOUT ACTUALLY PUTTING IN SOME EFFORT OF HIS OWN. Noo, he's already chasing the next grand idea.

Aaanyway. So basically, one of the ladies who're actually responsible for handling the adverts and me are the only person currently writing for the magazine. Advertising lady went to a meeting last Thursday when I had no babysitter, I went to a meeting on Monday (THREE FUCKING HOURS OF DRIVING AND BOREDOM, I MIGHT ADD) when she had no babysitter. It sort of evens out. But on Wednesday, I came home later than agreed upon again, and I was expected to continue working from home.

And the mom-in-law's had it. She's exhausted after dealing with the kids for more than an hour, which I don't really understand but have to accept, and if she can't rely on my coming home on time, she's no longer going to babysit. As it happens, on Wednesday she was just looking forward to relaxing, but just as often, she's got meetings or classes or a concert in the evening that she would have missed because bossman doesn't get his emails organised. So he's not just burning me out, he's making me burn her out, too.

So the next morning, I told him that I no longer had a babysitter. Situation changed. At first, he was pretty awesome about it. Asked what about if the company pays for part of it? Sure, that would be nice. Okay, he knew a lot of people and would pull some strings and I'd hear from him. I heard from him later and got the phone number of a lady who normally organises free stuff for children of poor-ish parents, like riding classes or piano lessons or karate or whatever else their parents can't afford. Awesome stuff, but not really what I need. But she knows some more people and will ask around and call back. And then I got some more phone numbers in the town where I'm working (as opposed to where I'm living). Unfortunately, he gave me those numbers on Friday at four in the afternoon. Guess how many people you reach after office time on Friday?
So he called me again and asked why I hadn't already found someone. After all, he pulled some strings. Um, maybe, but they were either not applicable, or I couldn't yet reach them? I could only tell him what lady-who-helps-underprivileged-kids had told me.
Apparently, she'd told him something else, or he had just expected something else, whatever. At any rate, he was starting to be pissed off. Hey, I can understand that, it sucks when you make plans and the people involved in those plans don't cooperate. For whatever reason. Nonetheless, I can't help it and I can't make yet other people cooperate.

So he said "I'm trying to help you, but you're aware that you signed a contract, and if you fall ill, that's an act of nature, but how you organise your childcare is ultimately your own problem?"
And I apparently completely surprised him by replying "Yes, sir, I'm aware of that, and it's awesome that you're trying to help me, and if I cannot solve this problem, I know we will have to cancel the contract. I'd hate that, but if that's what it boils down to, I'm still on probation so I'll be out in two weeks."
He was completely stunned.
And to be honest, that puzzles me. Does he think that the job is so awesome that I'll move heaven and earth in order to keep making 800 bucks a month? That I'm already married to the magazine and won't leave no matter what? Or did he think that I'd go "Oh yes, I forgot, I signed a contract, gosh, in that case, I'll lock my kids in the basement and come to the office at once then!"? Did he think that I wasn't aware that I need to solve that problem? I've been trying to do that for two months now. I really don't get it. Yes, I signed a contract, but contracts can be cancelled. The situation was looking different when I signed it. It's still a voluntary traineeship, right?

What I do get is that I could actually be pretty relaxed. Either his strings turn out to be helpful, in which case I can continue to do the job - as far as I can - because the kids will be taken (good!) care of. Or they'll prove useless, in which case I'll do the job for two more weeks and then it'll be over. I expect it'll leave a stain on my work record, but, you know, it's not like I have a flawless work record anyway. So really, I'm OK with either outcome. Well, actually I favour the "it won't work out" outcome a bit more, because bossman is, yes, a ~visionary~, but also a narcissist and perfectionist and a bit of a psychopath, and I don't need that in my work life. I've already got that at home! ;) That said, I'm beginning to suspect that bossmen actually don't come in any other flavours, so it'd only be a temporary reprieve. So I'd be OK with completing my two years there, too. It'd mean dealing with bossman and the regular madness of deadline week but it'd also be two years of work experience and I can afterwards move into teaching or to a saner working environment (if such a thing exists). But I'd also be OK if it ends here. So yeah, I could be relaxed.
If only one outcome wouldn't make the next two weeks really toxic. I mean, I could see what it was like for J., the Ex-boss-colleague, in the two weeks after he was fired. And for me, there'd be an additional taste of "but I relied on you and I had such great plaaans for you and you've betraaayed me!". I'm really scared of that.

But let's face it: I didn't fire my editor-in-chief without having someone to replace him. He was apparently expecting that me, the trainee, in her 20+ hours, would pull the weight of two. That was unrealistic frm the start. The fact that if I fall ill (or if my kids or their caretaker fall ill) or leave for good, the entire magazine crumbles... that, ultimately, isn't my problem. Problem is just, that's not how bossman is going to see it. It's what I may have to communicate, though.

Urgh, urgh.
oloriel: (random - blind patriotism)
Man möchte kotzen. Und zwar nicht mal akut wegen des erschreckend hohen Wahlerfolgs der AfD in einigen Landtagswahlen der vergangenen Woche(n), sondern wegen des ganzen dummen "Wahldebakel"-Geseiers, das darauf folgt.
"Denkzettel für die Kanzlerin". "Flüchtlingspolitik Schuld an der Missstimmung der Wähler". Was durfte ich heute in einem Leserbrief in der Zeitung lesen? "Die Mehrheit [...] will gesicherte Grenzen und geregelte Zuwanderung" und wählt natürlich nuuur deshalb AfD.
Jedenfalls sind sie alle am Heulen und Zähneklappern, und zwar vor allem in der CDU. Das machte mich stutzig, denn die CDU hatte ja nun immer noch eine recht deutliche Mehrheit, wieso kommt also ausgerechnet von dort das Gejaule?

Ich bin mal aus purer Neugierde auf die Seiten des statistischen Landesamts von Sachen-Anhalts gegangen. ICH! Aus NEUGIERDE! Auf eine STATISTIK-Seite! Da seht ihr mal, wie verzweifelt die Lage ist!
Na, jedenfalls hab ich mir da die bunten Kuchengrafiken der Landtagswahlen mal angeschaut. Und zwar die von 2011 und die von 2016.
(Warum? Weil mir Sachen-Anhalt als erstes einfiel. Sorry, Sachsen-Anhalt.)

Ehe wir uns nun falsch verstehen: Ja, 24,2% AfD sind furchtbar. Aber das Problem ist, dass man diesen Wählern eben nicht wirklich entgegen kommen kann. Ich sag's jetzt mal ganz hart, wer AfD wählt, ist entweder ein Arschloch oder naiv. Den Arschlöchern will man nicht entgegen kommen und die Naiven wird man schwerlich überzeugen.

UND:
Ausgerechnet die CDU, deren diverse Mitglieder jetzt so am Jaulen und am Umdenken-Wollen sind, hat sich da doch ganz wacker geschlagen. 2,7% Verluste sind, wenn man sich vergleichsweise mal die SPD oder die Linken anschaut, NICHTS. Ausgerechnet da gibt es also überhaupt keinen Grund, jetzt von einem Merkzettel für Denkel (ahahah, schöner Wortdreher, der darf bleiben!) und einem dringend nötigen Umdenken in der Flüchtlingspolitik zu wimmern. Sind bestimmt einige CDU-Stammwähler zur AfD gewechselt, sicher doch, aber insgesamt müssen dafür ja einige SPD-, Grünen oder gar Linken-Wähler plötzlich ihr Kreuzchen bei der CDU gemacht haben. UND DAS HABEN SIE SICHER NICHT, WEIL SIE MIT DER FLÜCHTLINGSPOLITIK NICHT EINVERSTANDEN SIND, SONDERN VIELLEICHT EHER SO EIN BISSCHEN IM GEGENTEIL?

Nu gut. Ich bin keine Politologin und habe auch nicht die Detaildaten, also schenke ich mir jetzt eine Analyse, wer wahrscheinlich warum von wo nach wo gewechselt ist. Ich sach bloß: Ausgerechnet die Partei, die am wenigsten unter der Entwicklung gelitten hat, sollte sich jetzt mal nicht ins Hemd machen und schon gar nicht anfangen, ins Horn der AfD zu stoßen. Denn die "enttäuschten" AfD-Wähler werden sie so nicht zurückgewinnen, aber die neu gewonnenen Wähler, die vielleicht eher von Gabriel enttäuscht sind als von Merkel, die gehen dann wieder zurück. Denn ja, dieses Wahlergebniss hat zweifellos auch etwas mit der Flüchtlingspolitik zu tun, aber womöglich anders, als ihr das glaubt.

Und ach ja, lieber Leserbriefschreiber, 24,2% sind Gottseidank noch keine Mehrheit.
Und wenn ihr so niedlich glaubt, bei der AfD ginge es nicht "undifferenziert gegen Asylbedürftige, sondern gegen eine chaotische, konzeptionslose, undurchdachte Politik" und deshalb wäre es voll OK, sie aus Protest zu wählen, dann seid ihr halt... na sagen wir mal, naiv.

Diesen Rant hätte ich mir jetzt vermutlich schenken sollen, aber es musste mal raus.

Ich hab übrigens den vagen Verdacht, dass die gewalttätigen Abiturienten in Köln nicht aus Syrien kommen...
oloriel: (I shoulda stayed in bed.)


it pours. Which is not fun if you're out camping.

(On the plus side, the new tent has now been properly rained in. And we've got a barn in which we could put it up to dry afterwards.)

It's also not fun to suffer lumbago on the morning of the day when you have to load the car with all (well, most of) our LARP equipment.

Not that I get to do any LARPing while running after the kidlets. But at least the lumbago got better fast.

It's not fun to come back and find out that the husband, who didn't come along because of other appointments, suffered acute hearing loss ("Hörsturz"). Likely cause: Too much stress. Nobody's surprised. Well, I'm surprised that it took this long. I've been expecting acute burn-out for over a year, to be honest. Well, now he's on sick leave for the week. The left ear is almost entirely deaf, the right ear has lost 40% of its capacity. If this hasn't improved significantly by tomorrow, the Otorhinolaryngothingamabob is going to put him on sick leave for at least a month. Also, cortisone with all that entails.

The straw that broke his back (or, in this case, ear) was the fact that our solar heating system broke. Yet again. This time, it blew most of its filling of stinky fluid into the heating/washing room on top of everything.

In that light, it's really silly to get upset (REALLY upset, as in absurdly furious) about the many idiotic things that the mother-in-law does. But when you're already on the edge, the smallest thing can set you off. You know that, I know that, she doesn't. She's really offended because "we always criticise her". Right now, neither Jörg nor I manage to care. She's always like "Well if you reach my age, you'll make mistakes too!" Woman, we make mistakes NOW. But we are aware that we're responsible for our mistakes. Even if we make them based on insufficient information we received by asking the wrong person the wrong question instead of thinking for ourselves for a second. But honestly, you can't always blame your age! Either you're sensible enough to make your own decisions, or you need to be put under tutelage. At whatever age.)

Well, buggre all this for a larke.

Sorry about the negativity. I hope the next post will be nicer.
oloriel: (discworld - safety first!)


Yesterday we had a minor (or maybe major? I'm not yet sure) familial crisis because of... Shockheaded Peter.

For those of you who are blessed in not knowing the book, let me just say that in my personal opinion Shockheaded Peter should only be looked at by people who are also old enough to emotionally handle movies rated 16+. The only people who need to read the book are maybe students of German literary history and/or infant psychology (How Not To Do It). Everyone else can happily go about their lives without a single line, and certainly without a whole poem. By no means should young and impressable children be exposed to it, even though the otherwise self-censorship-happy German printing businesses still lable it as "suitable for kindergardeners".

That's because older generations judge the book differently. In part because "they grew up with it and it didn't do them any harm", and in part because they have actually fond childhood memories of it. (Of course, some of the rhymes are funny or at the least entertaining; but let us not forget that they have been written to instill in young children a holy terror of thumb-sucking, rocking their chairs, not eating the soup mommy put in front of them and other dreadful sins. Yes, part of them is digestible; the rest has been specifically designed to traumatise children into obedience, which, I know, was considered a good way of turning them into productive citizens back in 1845 when the book was first published and, in fact, well into the 1970s. By the time they themselves become parents or even grandparents, they only remember the jolly rhymes, because of course at that point you're no longer afraid of the taylor with his scissors coming by to cut off your thumbs no matter how much you suck on them: You know that sort of thing doesn't really happen. I dare to postulate that a three-year-old may not in fact realise that.

(Excursus: A couple of years back, my cousin Ricardo was going on vacation with my parents and me. Don't quite recall how old he was -- oh wait, it was the year that Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix had been published, so he must have been 6. Late kindergarden age, in other words - at an age when even I would previously have accepted Shockheaded Peter as not necessarily a must-read, but manageable.
At any rate, my mom (shocked that her youngest brother - Ricardo's dad AND a bookseller - had never brought a copy of Shockheaded Peter home for his boys) read the book out to Ricardo. He was terrified, utterly terrified. My mother found this very puzzling because (much to her disapproval) Ricardo had already watched the first Lord of the Rings movies along with his older brothers, and those movies are rated 12+, and he's only 6, and all those monsters, and he wasn't terrified of those!
The important difference being, of course, that a six-year-old very well understands that Orcs and Nazgûl and Dark Lords don't live in our cities (he might even be aware that they don't exist at all!). Thumbsucking, on the other hand, tends to be a real-life experience for a six-year-old; he may even have been reprimanded for it, so the idea that a mother might go so far as to let someone radically solve the problem once and for all is just a little step from what he already knows. The terrors of Shockheaded Peter are laughable for adults, but they're not clearly distinguishable from reality for little kids! Yes, even if it's got Saint Nick appearing (oh wait, kids that age may well believe in St. Nick! oopsie!) and if cats can talk.)

So, because older generations have "happily" and "harmlessly" grown up with Shockheaded Peter, they still consider it suitable for kindergardeners. In fact, Felix has not even reached (conservative) kindergarden age ("3-6") yet. BUT NEVER MIND. At any rate, his doting grandmother (not my mom, but the other) has been quoting lines from Shockheaded Peter to Felix. I voiced my disapproval; she said "Well, it's only a few lines and nothing of the bad stuff". As it was, it's been from "The Dreadful Story of the Matches", but only the beginning, when little Pauline is just prancing around and discovering the matches, and the two cats are raising their paws and protesting that Mommy Has Forbidden You To Touch This. Not the part where Pauline disobeys Mommy and the kittens and burns all up, Look at her works, ye infants, and despair. So I figured I had to let it pass.
Felix, to nobody's surprise, loved the funny verses and has since been repeating the lines he's heard.
I mentioned my discomfort with this fact to the mother-in-law, again. As long as it was only these lines, OK, no harm done yet; but let's not take it any further, OK?

That was clearly waaaay too subtle, because while on a trip to the bookstore she bought a whole copy of Shockheaded Peter. (Quite pointless, by the way, because she already owns an anthology of funny German verse-stories unsuitable for little children that I asked her not to show to Felix anytime soon, but never mind, it's so easy to forget about these things!) Yesterday, while both she and my own parents were visiting, she produced the book. I said I did not feel the time was right.
"But it was written by a pediatrist - he should know!"
Yeah, because 1845 pediatrists were surely on a totally modern standard as far as childrearing is concerned. Ahahahahah.
"But it says 'kindergarden age' on the back!"
Tradition totally overrules my concerns, of course!
"We all grew up with it and it didn't do us any harm!"
I told the episode of Ricardo on that train journey to Tuscany. My mother had already forgotten about it and now felt guilty again, ten years later. (I did not make it up; it's in her travel diary, too. I checked this just now - just in case!)
At this point, Felix came running for granny, who beamed proudly and said "Look what granny brought" and opened the book for him.

At that point, I snapped.
"'Ooooh, I'll always respect your opinion where childrearing is concerned, and I'll never interfere,' she said", I said. "'I'll always ask before giving anything to Felix, and accept your judgement,' she said."
Stunned looks from her; Jörg jumping in: "But I don't have a problem with it!"
"Then we should settle that before anyone makes a decision."
"Nothing needs to be settled, you never said you had a problem with it."
I then left the room (possibly uttering something along the lines of "Kiss my butt, you do what you want anyway".)

No, I'm not proud of that scene. I'm not proud of dashing the mother-in-laws excitement, and I'm not proud of snapping at her, particularly in front of my own parents. I wish it had gone otherwise; but what's done is done.

However, I still think my outbreak wasn't entirely unjustified. It didn't come "out of the blue" as Jörg later said, at any rate. I have regularly expressed my disapproval - not to him, because he wasn't the addressee, but to his mother. I probably shouldn't have been surprised that she either didn't give a fuck or just didn't listen (which is more likely), but somehow, I always am. It's the same thing with the sweets she constantly brings for Felix: She always SHOWS them first, then asks if he can have them. At that point, I can either be the asshole who ruins Felix' anticipation (because he's already seen the treat, of course), or nod my OK. No pressure! I have asked her not to do that, but by now of course he knows that there's always something in her basket for him, so the point is moot anyway. Yesterday, she also complained that his first action, after acknowledging that "Granny is here!", is to go "What's in granny's basket?" Well, it's what you trained him to do! -- But I know, bringing up other peeves while arguing one point is bad style, so I'll shut up about that.

Suffice it to say that she left in a huff, Jörg insists that the two of us have to discuss that even though I feel that he could more easily play the middleman. He also insists that there's nothing wrong with letting Felix have the book, and surely his opinion is as valid as mine. As much as mine, but not more so, I hope! I am willing to discuss the matter with him and figure out a time (before 2027) at which I'll accept Felix' exposure to Shockheaded Peter. Yes, I am willing to accept some kind of foul compromise, even though let's face it, we have a very conservative family model in which I, the mother, am the fuck responsible for raising the kid (and dealing with his traumata, too!) while daddy earns our bread and butter, so in all honesty I think that in questions of education I should have a 75% vote at the very least. BUT NEVER MIND. Take your 50%, but I do insist on settling such questions BEFORE creating faits accomplis and then going "Well I didn't know you minded!"

And quite honestly, ignore me and don't do as I ask, but then do me a favour and stop blabbing your beloved "I'll always respect your judgement about childrearing, and I'll always ask before giving Felix anything, and you'll always have the last word!" mantra, because it's clearly bullshit. If you meant "I'll only listen when it suits me, and I'll do whatever the fuck I like, because I'm a grandmother and grandmothers are allowed to spoil their grandchildren and/or otherwise interfere with what their mothers think is right", then just SAY so. That way, I won't be surprised into bitch mode.

Yes, yesterday was bad form, and I wish it had gone otherwise; but at least neither Jörg nor his mother can say they never heard me disagree. But of course, all I can do now is feel guilty and worried and upset. Fuck it.
oloriel: (home improvement totoro)


Not really; I currently churn out fanfic at an alarming rate. Seriously, I've produced about 70,000 words since August, so I feel no guilt whatsoever about ignoring all the NaNo mails. Even less guilt if I actually use November to finish and revise last year's NaNovel, which is Original and, I hope, will at some point be publishable.

But I've been writing very little about real life. So I'll throw a couple of bulletpoints into the ether. I may expand on them later on, or not, or in comments, or whatever -- but at least that way, I won't really forget it.

-- Desaster in the boiler room. The ventile on the exhauster of the heating system burst, which made the heating system drip water until the exhauster came off entirely, flooding the boiler room.
On the plus side, we're having a warm October so we're not desperately dependent on the heat. I mean, it could've happened in January. On the minus side, the same system is responsible for our hot water. Not so bad for us, because we have an old electric boiler in the downstairs bathroom so we can still take hot showers; worse for the tenants, who have no electric boiler and only get cold showers. (Lukewarm while the solar system on the barn roof is still in action.)
Really bad: It's not just the exhauster that needed repairing, because thanks to the flooding, the electronic control panel gave up its ghost. It has now been replaced, but now it's turned out that the compressor has also suffered damaged and also needs to be replaced -- well, it's not over yet. Hurrah.

-- Swimming teacher drama. Felix is currently taking a toddler swimming class, which doesn't actually mean swimming but fun game-like exercises in the swimming pool that will supposedly help kids to save themselves or at least keep themselves from drowning until help arrives, should they fall into a swimming pool. Sensible enough.
It's just that Felix doesn't (yet) care for most of the exercises. Unfortunately, the swimming teacher is convinced that a two-year old must follow unfamiliar instructions and if he protests, that's just a tantrum. After a particularly dramatic teacher-induced tantrum, she spouted some pseudo-pedagogic bullshitand made a lot of suggestions that I knew I could not follow (I'm not gonna ignore my kid when he's panicking in the swimming pool, even if I know that he cannot possibly drown
Fortunately, the week after that, she agreed that if Felix didn't want to do the exercises, he could just sit on the stairs and watch. Felix spent the entire hour walking up and down the stairs, squatting down and very slowly submerging his hands and wrists and elbow and shoulders, clearly experimenting with the sensation of different depths of water. Whenever the swimming teacher came closer, you could see his face twist... but she left us alone for the most part. I hope it stays that way, until Felix decides that he'd like to try the "fun" games too.

-- Varroa infestation. In summer, my bees were practically varroa-free; unfortunately, the darn mites have increased insanely in fall. I've already treated my colonies with formic acid, which made them shed dead mites like crazy, but there shouldn't have been so many in the first place. Damn. Now I can just hope that they still have enough intact winter bees to make it through, well, winter. :(

-- Computer argh. Jörg's computer has been slow and stupid for a long time, but then it suddenly stopped working altogether. Normally, Jörg has enough computer parts lying around for makeshift solutions, but now he hadn't, so we actually had to take the computer to a local repair shop. Well, it turned out that the graphics board had committed suicide, but once that was replaced, Jörg also found a friendly virus (which explains why the computer has behaving more stupid than usual in the past weeks, haha). It ended with the full format-and-start-over routine. Particularly helpful since there are a lot of bills that need to be paid and the tax declaration to prepare. (Well, the tax declaration has been waiting since at least March, and Jörg never got around to doing it, so I suppose this was the universe's way of telling him that he waited too long.)

-- Oh, and we're again/still broke. Have been ever since the big renovation in the tenants' part of the house last year, which I also didn't blog about, and holy crap, that was a bloggable piece of drama that really should be documented somewhere, but I can't be bothered now. Suffice it to say that it completely blew our resources, and to make matter nicer, the old tenants afterwards decided to move home, and it took us half a year to find new tenants, which means half a year of no rent, which isn't helping if you're already broke. Well, it isn't helping if the heating system breaks down, either. Or if the computer acts up. Or if I'm too stupid to parallel park and make a dent into our car's bumper (fortunately, the opponent was a brick wall, which didn't take damage). The bumper is plastic crap, so it broke in one single spot, which means the entire thing has to be replaced. -- Actually, now I remember why I haven't posted about most real life stuff, because it's just too frustrating to think, let alone write about.

-- Oh well. At least the bout of hormone-/whatever-induced out-of-breathness and exhaustion is mostly over. That is, I need a lot of sleep, but at least I feel awake after that. Seems to have been fixed by a combination of sunlight and more meat on the menu. Maybe it just was last week's cleaning spree (on Sunday, we had visitors who'd never seen the house before, and I didn't want them to get too horrible an impression). And a lack of iron, of course. ;)
oloriel: (gardening & stuff - starflower)


Meine LARP-Botanikerin Khibil ist aus den Drachenlanden zurück, aber irgendwie komme ich aus der Rolle noch nicht raus.

Da ist zum Beispiel dieser Zeitungsartikel heute morgen, der berichtet, das NRW-Umweltministerium warne vor der bösartigen Beifuß-Ambrosie. Dieses hinterhältige, aus Nordamerika eingeschleppte Gewächs wird demnächst blühen und seine extrem Allergie auslösenden Pollen in die Landschaft schleudern; nur drei Pollen pro 1000 Liter Luft genügen, um allergische Reaktionen hervorzurufen, und zwar auch bei Leuten, die normalerweise keine allergischen Symptome zeigen. Wenn man die Pflanze findet, soll man sie a) melden und b) vernichten, sinniger Weise möglichst, bevor sie blüht.

Und damit man nicht versehentlich harmlose Gewächse ausreißt, weil man gar nicht so recht weiß, wie so eine garstige Beifuß-Ambrosie ausschaut, bietet das Umweltministerium noch eine Liste an harmlosen Pflanzen, die man leicht damit verwechseln kann. Klingt sinnvoll, vor allem, weil man ja auch eine böse Beifuß-Ambrosie im Garten haben könnte und sie ahnungslos wachsen lässt, bis sie ganze Nachbarschaft hustend und röchelnd darniederliegt.

Aber dann sieht die Liste so aus:
"Ungefährliche [...] Doppelgänger sind die Stauden-Ambrosie, der Gemeine Beifuß, Wermut, Weißer Gänsefuß, Grünähriger Amarant, Odermennig, Färber-Reseda, Hundspetersilie, Phacelie, Goldrute, der Stinkende Storchschnabel, Rainfarn und der Einjährige Beifuß."

...
...
...

Ich bin keine Biologin. Ich habe aber diverse dieser "harmlosen Doppelgänger" im Garten und bin nach dem Frühstück mal rausgegangen, um sie zu fotografieren, weil das mein Erstaunen vielleicht besser illustriert als ein bloßer Rant, für diejenigen, die diese Pflanzen vielleicht nicht spontan erkennen würden.


Bilder unterm Cut )

Selbst als unbedarfte Hobbygärtnerin sehe ich da riesige Unterschiede und frage mich, wie ein einzelnes Gewächs mit einer solchen Vielfalt verwechselt werden können soll. Denn das sind ja alles "Doppelgänger" - deren Wort, nicht meins! Die größte Gefahr geht offensichtlich nicht von den Pollen aus, sondern von den unglaublich vielseitigen Tarnkünsten dieses tückischen Gewächses, das vermutlich demnächst die Weltherrschaft an sich reißen wird, weil es sich bald auch als Homo sapiens sapiens verkleiden kann...

Das, oder das Umweltministerium ist sich selbst nicht so ganz sicher, wie sie nun aussieht, die Beifuß-Ambrosie. In diesem Falle tue ich das, was man eigentlich nicht tun soll: Ich verweise auf Wikipedia, die freundlicher Weise anstelle einer bizarren Liste vermeintlicher Doppelgänger schlicht und ergreifend ein Foto anbietet. (Welches für mein Auge keine verwechselbaren Ähnlichkeiten mit irgendeiner der oben genannten Pflanzen abbildet, aber hey, ich bin ja auch keine Biologin, geschweige denn im Umweltministerium tätig.)
Ansonsten sehe ich in den nächsten Wochen viele Fehlalarme voraus. Inklusive psychosomatischer Allergieanfälle.

[Anmerkung der Verfasserin: Bei der im Icon abgebildeten Blüte handelt es sich übrigens um Borretsch, welches trotz der Blütenform nur sehr entfernt mit den Nachtschattengewächsen verwandt ist, aber wegen der gar grauslichen Pyrrozidinalalkaloide trotzdem mit Vorsicht zu genießen ist. Aber das ist eine andere Geschichte und soll ein anderes Mal erzählt werden.]
oloriel: (dr horrible - i should be more careful)


When I look at some of the political/social discussions on Tumblr, I'm actually happy that LJ is going out of fashion. (Although of course these debates take place on LJ, too -- but you have to join the respective communities, or friend the right people, to get in on them. And the actual heat is elsewhere. On Tumblr, everything is everywhere all the time.)

Maybe I'm just lazy, or too comfortable, or too privileged, or too whatever. But even what little I see through the filter of the few people I follow there just makes me feel tired. I respect people's struggle, but sometimes I feel that in everyone's attempts to make everything better, the only result is an environment where everybody has to watch every word they say lest they be considered sexist (in any direction), racist, abilist*, culturally appropriating, apologistic or whatever. I am not saying that fighting against these attitudes in their actual incarnations isn't worthy. But I do think it can be overdone. Not too mention the whole "more under-privileged than thou" thing going on, or the debate whether you're actually allowed to fight for something that doesn't directly immediately concern you, or whether that means you're appropriating and thereby devaluing the cause, and... oh good grief, this is precisely why I am too lazy most of the time.

I recently read somewhere that our society is currently becoming more and more Jacobinic. Without meaning to appropriate, belittle, water down or otherwise corrupt either the historical or the cultural context of post-revolutionary 18th century France, I think there's some truth to that. I don't like to blame social media for everything, either, but sometimes the atmosphere on Tumblr (as well as in the specific LJ communities, or on general Social Justice sites) really encourages Reign-of-Terror-esque² attitudes.

And that's not what you want, especially when you've actually got a worthy cause, because it's only going to (at best) alienate the people you want to have on your side.

So really, all I want to say is RELAX. AND PICK YOUR BATTLES WISELY.
And more sparingly.

Though I guess that's not a wise thing to say on Tumblr.

- - -
*Yes, I hate the term "ableist". "Fundamentally away from lions"? Whatev. So I use my own. If that means I'm abilist towards the morphologically challenged, so bloody be it.

²Disclaimer: No, I didn't experience the Reign of Terror first-hand. (SURPRISING! I KNOW!) I didn't even grow up in the GDR! I am wholly unqualified! This is more what we lazy people call a hyperbolic metaphor. Possibly slightly polemic, too.

Profile

oloriel: (Default)
oloriel

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
232425262728 29
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2025 06:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios