oloriel: (tolkien - Stay away from jewellery)
[personal profile] oloriel


Random fannish squee moment of the day, via [livejournal.com profile] ladyelleth.

Escrick sapphire ring's mystery history sparks meeting

LOOK AT THAT RING. THAT IS CLEARLY A STAR OF FËANOR. Well, very nearly. Very very nearly. 7th to 11th century? WELL MAYBE MAGLOR LOST IT.

Say, [livejournal.com profile] mirien, would you say you can replicate something like that? I mean, it's a genuine historical find, so it ain't touching copyright laws, no? :D

Icon used for ironic relevance.

Date: 2013-01-29 08:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] samtyr.livejournal.com
So cool! And did I read correctly that it is the *second* such find? Maybe Curufin or Celebrimbor made it for Maglor as a gift?

Oh my, the bunnies are feeding now!
Edited Date: 2013-01-29 08:19 pm (UTC)

Date: 2013-01-30 01:18 pm (UTC)
ext_45018: (Default)
From: [identity profile] oloriel.livejournal.com
I think the other, similar find was likewise made of gold, glass and sapphire - the design may have been completely different. Or that's how I read it.

7th to 11th century CE is a bit late for Curufin or even Celebrimbor, but it would work perfectly with my "Putting the 'alf' in Alfred the Great" plotbunny. :D

Date: 2013-01-30 02:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] samtyr.livejournal.com
But what if Celebrimbor had a *daughter*? Or even a granddaughter? Wasn't it you who posted about the dig where the found a skeleton of a woman jewelry maker? So many women went unmentioned by the Professor, and if they were only half-elven -- unlike say the Peredhil...

Date: 2013-01-30 02:46 pm (UTC)
ext_45018: (tolkien - oh for eru's sake.)
From: [identity profile] oloriel.livejournal.com
Hey, hey, hey. I did not, for a second, assume that the Austrian jewellery maker is half (or even a quarter, or whatever) Elven. She's human, or was when she was alive. I also don't think she's got to be related to anyone famous (real or imaginary); some people manage to acquire skills all by themselves, without helpful genetics. Thank you.

Also, there's just the teeniest, tiniest temporal discrepancy between "about 16,000 BC" and "between the 7th and 11th century [CE]".

I'm all for conspiracy theories, but linking these two is a bit too much for my humble tastes.
Edited Date: 2013-01-30 02:47 pm (UTC)

Date: 2013-01-30 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] samtyr.livejournal.com
Well, yes, that's very true. But at the same time, it is a lovely idea, to think of them as being extremely *distant* relations. ::dreamy sigh::

Profile

oloriel: (Default)
oloriel

April 2023

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
232425262728 29
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2026 06:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios